Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: A seeming paradox.
نویسندگان
چکیده
It appears paradoxical that science is producing outstanding new results and theories at a rapid rate at the same time that researchers are identifying serious problems in the practice of science that cause many reports to be irreproducible and invalid. Certainly, the practice of science needs to be improved, and scientists are now pursuing this goal. However, in this perspective, we argue that this seeming paradox is not new, has always been part of the way science works, and likely will remain so. We first introduce the paradox. We then review a wide range of challenges that appear to make scientific success difficult. Next, we describe the factors that make science work-in the past, present, and presumably also in the future. We then suggest that remedies for the present practice of science need to be applied selectively so as not to slow progress and illustrate with a few examples. We conclude with arguments that communication of science needs to emphasize not just problems but the enormous successes and benefits that science has brought and is now bringing to all elements of modern society.
منابع مشابه
New Initiatives to Improve the Rigor and Reproducibility of Articles Published in Circulation Research
The rampant irreproducibility of scientific articles is arguably the most serious problem that bedevils biomedical research. It is a veritable plague that undermines the credibility of published studies, hinders clinical translation of basic work, and impedes the progress of medicine. Disquietingly, the problem seems to be getting worse rather than better. Although the causes of irreproducibili...
متن کاملMake researchers revisit past publications to improve reproducibility
Scientific irreproducibility is a major issue that has recently increased attention from publishers, authors, funders and other players in the scientific arena. Published literature suggests that 50-80% of all science performed is irreproducible. While various solutions to this problem have been proposed, none of them are quick and/or cheap. Here, we propose one way of reducing scientific ir...
متن کاملNew Initiatives to Improve the Rigor and Reproducibility of Articles Published in Circulation Research.
The rampant irreproducibility of scientific articles is arguably the most serious problem that bedevils biomedical research. It is a veritable plague that undermines the credibility of published studies, hinders clinical translation of basic work, and impedes the progress of medicine. Disquietingly, the problem seems to be getting worse rather than better. Although the causes of irreproducibili...
متن کاملThe Osteological Paradox 20 Years Later: Past Perspectives, Future Directions
More than 20 years ago, Wood et al. (Curr Anthropol 33:343–370, 1992) published ‘‘The Osteological Paradox: Problems of Inferring Prehistoric Health from Skeletal Samples,’’ in which they challenged bioarchaeologists to consider the effects of heterogeneous frailty and selective mortality on health inferences in past populations. Here, we review the paper’s impact on bioarchaeology and paleopat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
دوره 115 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018